It ain't a leak
...unless my pants are wet.
The GOP pudsuckers at the WSJ (We Savor Jizz?) go to bat for Rove on Tweety's show.
Media Matters - Wall Street Journal 's Harwood: Rove's alleged "backhanded confirmations" in Plame case were not leaks
Wall Street Journal's Harwood: Rove's alleged "backhanded confirmations" in Plame case were not leaksTechnorati Tags: Rove, WSJ, leak, lies, fellatio
Summary: On MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, Wall Street Journal national political editor John Harwood claimed that White House senior adviser Karl Rove was at most guilty of "backhanded confirmations" of classified information and therefore cannot reasonably be accused of leaking. Harwood's assertion amounts to the claim that mere confirmation -- as opposed to actual disclosure -- of classified information does not constitute an unauthorized leak. Harwood's assertion is not supported by the law or the facts.
